Taft College Academic Senate Minutes <\/strong><\/p>\n Monday, October 1, 2012 Cougar Conference Room<\/p>\n \n <\/p>\n Attendees<\/strong>: Jennifer Altenhofel, Kanoe Bandy, Michelle Beasley, David Berry, Wendy Berry, Eric B\u00e9rub\u00e9, Darcy Bogle, Joe\u2019ll Chaidez, Bill Devine, Candace Duron, , Geoffrey Dyer, John Eigenauer,<\/p>\n Juana Escobedo, Sharyn Eveland, Shelly Getty, Greg Golling, Gary Graupman, Vicki Herder, Brian Jean, Diane Jones, David Layne, Mike Mayfield, Michelle Oja, Ruby Payne, Harold Pease, Joseph Polizzotto, David Reynolds, Jeff Ross, Rebecca Roth, Sonja Swenson, Linda West<\/p>\n The meeting was called to order at 12:15 p.m.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Public Commentary<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n The group was treated to a fantastic lunch courtesy of Leon Denweed, owner of Big Denweed\u2019s Friendly Catering. Leon is a former student and donated the lunch for the meeting.<\/p>\n Review of September 4, 2012 Senate Minutes<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n The minutes were approved with one correction.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Dr. Dena Maloney<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n Dr. Maloney updated the Senate on a number of topics including the current budget, the 50 Percent law, and her goals for the academic year.<\/p>\n The Board of Trustees passed the budget at the September meeting. The budget was constructed based upon the November measure failing to pass. The Board has approved the use of $1.1 million from the reserve. As a result, we can continue as is without making further cuts this year. However, if the measure doesn\u2019t pass, we are looking at budget cuts next academic year because we can\u2019t continue utilizing reserves at the current level.<\/p>\n The college did not comply with the 50 Percent law during the past reporting year. The law states that 50 percent of expenditures must be for faculty salaries and benefits. Although it sounds like a simple requirement, the process of allocating expenses can be complicated. The college missed the requirement by $95,000 and has applied for an exemption. If a college is out of compliance, the amount of the shortfall is set aside out of next year\u2019s budget and state allocation is reduced by that amount. A task force has been formed to analyze factors leading to the root cause of the deficit. Dr. Maloney stated that the cause of the shortfall will be determined and we will move forward to compliance.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Dr. Maloney outlined a number of goals for the college, including:<\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n Dr. Maloney stated she wanted to place a big emphasis on open communication with both the campus and off-campus communities. She asked that we please forward newsletter ideas along to her.<\/p>\n CEED Grant Faculty Positions<\/span> \u00a0– \u00a0Sam Aunai<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n Sam Aunai presented a proposal to hire a non-tenure track Engineering and Energy Technology full-time faculty position. The position would be funded by the CEED grant. The college currently has five years remaining on the grant after this academic year. Sam is looking for alternative funding sources to continue the position once the grant ends. A full-time faculty member in this area will serve to provide program consistency through coordination, program development, subject matter expertise, and connection with business and industry. In addition, the instructor will teach some of the program related classes.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Academic Senate Secretary Position<\/u>\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0– \u00a0 \u00a0Tony Thompson<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n Linda West was unanimously elected to serve as Academic Senate Secretary.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Sabbatical Task Force<\/u>\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0–\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Eric B\u00e9rub\u00e9 and Vicki Herder<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n Although the Faculty Collective Bargaining Agreement states the requirements for taking Sabbatical Leave, there appears to be no clear process in place for doing so. Eric and Vicki suggested forming a task force consisting of three faculty members and an administrator to develop a Sabbatical Leave process to bring back to the Senate. The task force will use the Sabbaticals: Effective Practices for Proposals, Implementation, and Follow-Up <\/em>guidelines adopted by the Academic Senate for California Community Colleges in Spring 2008 as a foundation. Eric B\u00e9rub\u00e9, Vicki Herder, and Dave Berry agreed to serve on the task force.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Budget\u00a0<\/u><\/strong>Committee\u00a0Update\u00a0 – \u00a0<\/u>David Layne<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n David Layne reported the Budget Committee is currently reviewing program review goals and developing a list of resources required to meet those goals. He stated the Budget Committee is not a decision-making committee.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Resolution in Support of Proposition 30<\/u>\u00a0 \u00a0–\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Tony Thompson<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n Tony Thompson presented a resolution in support of the passage of Proposition 30 (see attached) to the Board of Trustees at the October meeting for Senate review and approval. The proposal generated some discussion regarding whether or not it was appropriate for the senate to be taking a political stand. It was moved by Diane Jones and seconded by Kanoe Bandy to present the resolution to the Board of Trustees. The motion carried by majority vote with four nays.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Faculty Hiring Process<\/u>\u00a0 \u00a0– \u00a0 Bill Devine, Division Chairs<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n It was reported the division chairs have had several meetings regarding the faculty hiring process and have recommended no major change. It was suggested to eliminate the faculty ranking sheets but keep the criteria for use in November division chair presentations. It looks like at least two faculty positions will be filled.<\/p>\n Craig Johnson brought up the necessity of using accurate and consistent data in the presentations and suggested division chairs use the data provided by the Institutional Research office for program review. Craig stated it would be helpful if we could see a comparison sheet of the data. Concern was expressed, however, that each division is different and the data doesn\u2019t apply to all equally. It was also mentioned that we must keep in mind that not all positions count toward the 50% law.<\/p>\n A motion was made by Darcy Bogle and seconded by Jeff Ross to use the existing ranking sheets for division chair presentations and include a sheet provided by the Institutional Research office providing data to support the criteria as it relates to the position. The motion carried.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Meeting was adjourned at 1:03 p.m.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The next meeting is scheduled for 12:10-1:00 p.m. on Monday, November 5th. Respectfully submitted by<\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n Linda West<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Academic Senate Secretary Attachment<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Resolution in support of Proposition 30 on the November ballot: Temporary Taxes to Fund Education, Guaranteed Local Public Safety Funding<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n WHEREAS, <\/strong>The California Community Colleges is the nation\u2019s largest system of higher education and provides access to higher education to more than 2.4 million students; and<\/p>\n WHEREAS, <\/strong>The California Community Colleges is the largest workforce training provider in the state and plays an essential role in keeping California\u2019s economy competitive; and<\/p>\n WHEREAS, <\/strong>California\u2019s higher education system is in a crisis situation with insufficient resources at a time of record demand due to high school graduates and unemployed residents seeking retraining; and<\/p>\n <\/p>\n WHEREAS, <\/strong>California Community Colleges have been cut by $1 billion or 12 percent from the 2008-09 fiscal year to today; and<\/p>\n WHEREAS, <\/strong>the total revenue cuts to the West Kern Community College District during this same time period total $1.2 million; and<\/p>\n WHEREAS, <\/strong>if Proposition 30 fails, the West Kern Community College would realize a cut in revenue of $1,128,325, which would then bring the total cut in revenue from the 2008-09 fiscal year to $2,328,325; and<\/p>\n WHEREAS, <\/strong>Proposition 30 has a direct positive effect on the K-14 educational systems and Proposition 38 benefits only the K-12 system; and<\/p>\n WHEREAS, <\/strong>if passed, Proposition 30 would provide $34.5 billion in deferral payments and funding restoration over five years, which would allow the West Kern Community College District to maintain status quo, or perhaps give an increase of up to $175,000; and<\/p>\n <\/p>\n WHEREAS, <\/strong>California\u2019s locally elected Community College trustees, together with their Administrators, Faculty, staff, and students, are best able to decide where budget reductions can be absorbed while minimizing the impact on their communities; and<\/p>\n WHEREAS, <\/strong>a study conducted this year by University of California researchers concluded that for every<\/p>\n $1 invested in public higher education, the state gets $4.50 in return; and<\/p>\n <\/p>\n WHEREAS, <\/strong>the Academic Senates of both the University of California and the California State University systems, and the Board of Governors have adopted resolutions in support of Proposition 30; and<\/p>\n WHEREAS, <\/strong>the Taft College Academic Senate recognizes and is sensitive to, the philosophy that the vast majority of voters are opposed to tax increases; and<\/p>\n <\/p>\n WHEREAS, <\/strong>the Taft College Academic Senate views the current fiscal crisis affecting the California Community Colleges as the most severe in the system\u2019s history; be it<\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n RESOLVED, <\/strong>the Taft College Academic Senate supports the passage of Proposition 30 to prevent our community, our college, our students, and our entire staff from enduring the incredible damage we would face if it fails to pass.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n\n
\n
\n
\n