{"id":782,"date":"2008-09-19T15:41:06","date_gmt":"2008-09-19T15:41:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ct-test-wp.taftcollege.edu\/itc\/?p=67"},"modified":"2008-09-19T15:41:06","modified_gmt":"2008-09-19T15:41:06","slug":"september-19-2008-minutes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/itc\/september-19-2008-minutes\/","title":{"rendered":"September 19, 2008 Minutes"},"content":{"rendered":"
Information Technology<\/strong> Members Present: Adrian Agundez, Dave Berry, Rick Garcia, Mark Gibson, Richard Hudson, Brian Jean, Brian asked if this could be done without the Mac address as they have had problems with that and Mark confirmed that it could be done. 3. Classroom Technology Needs \u2013 general discussion<\/span> <\/p>\n
\nMEETING MINUTES
\nFriday, September 19, 2008
\n10:00 am T-12<\/p>\n
\nLinda West.
\nRecorder: Michaela Young
\nMeeting start: 10:05 am
\n1. Approval of minutes from ITC Meeting on April 18, 2008
\nThe minutes were approved unanimously
\n2. ACS (Access Control Server) \u2013 presentation by Mark Gibson<\/span>
\nMark explained that the ACS is a backbone providing support for switches to allow devices to be mobile. This means<\/p>\n\n
\nBrian then asked when it would be ready.
\nMark explained that the server is in place and the hardware portion is finished; once the VPN is done the wireless port can be addressed.
\nAdrian added that this would help cut down on staff involvement.
\nBrian asked if the ACS was going to be obsolete if we were going to be a hotspot (meaning anyone could walk in and access the internet).
\nAdrian explained that the ACS would help separate things out and would serve as a means to be able to monitor email traffic coming in or going out.
\nBrian asked when this will be completed.
\nMark advised that he will have to plan a downtime \u2013 he wants to bring all wireless together and lock it down to be better able to watch it. He hopes to have it ready for spring semester.<\/p>\n
\nAdrian said he wanted to know what the expectations were for classrooms in regard to technology
\nneeds. He is looking at the science building and the needs there. He asked if VHS was still needed and
\nif the projectors should be kept the same. The goal is to have every room equipped with the necessary
\nitems to avoid having to move equipment around. He then asked if the group would like to see the use of
\ndata projectors or LCD monitors.
\nDave Berry asked about the cost for each.
\nAdrian advised that the cost for an LCD monitor is approximately $1,600 versus approximately $1,090
\nfor a data projector and screen.
\nBrian pointed out that the LCD monitor is stationary and could not be moved around like a data
\nprojector, which might be okay for some rooms but not for math.
\nAdrian asked if they would want to go with the LCD monitors for the meeting room in the science
\nbuilding and the tech buildings.
\nBrian said that faculty had decided on overhead projectors and white boards in the conference room in
\nthe back \u2013 he did not know about the meeting room.
\nAdrian advised he would order a few new projectors to be ready when swing space was being moved.
\nHe then pointed out that DVD\u2019s do not run well from laptops and asked if they should go strictly with
\nDVD players or VHS also.
\nBrian suggested getting combos.
\nAdrian then addressed presentation carts. He said that they currently have 5 carts; 2 of them run older
\nversions of Windows and they will be replaced. He asked if more carts were needed.
\nMark commented that it would be better instead to have each room equipped other than the buildings
\nstill being re-built.
\nRich added that he would like to see extra ports for laptops. It might be a good idea to have speakers
\nmounted in the rooms to hook into.
\nMark said each room should have a box with network connections and audio in the instructor\u2019s area.
\nAdrian mentioned a company by the name of \u201cExtron\u201d who designs \u201csmart classrooms\u201d with products
\nlike controllers for VCR\u2019s, etc.
\nBrian voiced his concerns saying their reputation was unknown and it might be hard to fix things when
\nthey break. He said that Rich\u2019s suggestion for audio made sense. It had not been discussed before, but
\nwith the new construction it might be a good idea to have surround-sound-type audio in each classroom.
\nAdrian pointed out that they have built-in AV boxes to plug everything into but right now is it is an
\nempty box with 2 2\u201d pipes going up the ceiling with the power possibly being 5\u2019 away. He wants to
\nchange that to have power running to the box.
\nHe then addressed the issue of how soon Vista was needed on campus and suggested waiting as there
\nwere plenty of issues with Banner to be dealt with currently and there were other issues with
\ncompatibility with other products still.
\nLinda pointed out that all her textbooks assume the use of Vista.
\nBrian asked if Vista could be used just for the labs.
\nAdrian replied that once one area uses a new product usually everyone wants to use it. If there is a real
\nneed for it, however, every machine needs to have 2-4 gigs of ram.
\nBrian asked Linda if not having Vista was creating problems for her. She said that the students don\u2019t
\nreally notice it.
\n4. Issue Track \u2013 presentation by Richard Hudson<\/span>
\nRich explained that Issue Track is an all-in-one helpdesk solution which keeps track of hardware,
\nsoftware and also provides a ticket system. Currently there is no way of prioritizing or looking at a
\nhistory of what has been done. Rich said that he has done some asset management which enables him to show equipment, model numbers, serial numbers, Mac addresses, etc.; requests can be submitted via the use of drop-down lists.
\nAdrian explained that the program is tied to the active directory and there will be a link on everybody\u2019s desktop; it will track requests with time, date, etc.; it will also be used by Maintenance\/Operations and Institutional Research (requests for reports).
\nRich pointed out that this program also provides a history of how the process was addressed in the knowledge base for future reference. These references would allow people to troubleshoot some issues themselves if they wanted to.
\nAdrian added that another available option is to have an e-mail sent to the person responsible for the task to let them know they have a pending request.
\nBrian asked when the program was ready to be implemented.
\nRich said that more data needed to be entered in the active directory and there was no projected date yet.
\nAdrian said that maybe in 2 months they can come out with a \u201clight version\u201d.
\n5. Science Building Update<\/span>
\nAdrian advised that the original plan was for construction to be done in July, was then moved to October 15th, and the current projected date is sometime in November.
\n6. Apple Server Update (Rob Teel)<\/span>
\nRob was out sick \u2013 this item was cancelled.
\n7. Other<\/span>
\nBrian pointed out that hardly anyone had shown up for the meeting and was wondering if maybe this was not a good time for the Committee to meet.
\nAdrian advised that Michaela will contact all Committee members to find out.
\nBrian addressed the issue of the meeting room in the science building again and asked if more input was needed.
\nAdrian said that faculty input was needed.
\nBrian added that the Math Department will have its own small conference room – the big conference room is going to be used by the whole campus. He asked if Linda was the one to handle scheduling.
\nAdrian will talk to facilities.
\nBrian suggested using the big conference room to have a good sound system installed; this would also provide feedback to IT with everyone using it.
\nAdrian will look into that.
\nThe meeting was adjourned at 10:04 am.<\/p>\n
\n