{"id":233,"date":"2015-03-19T22:31:58","date_gmt":"2015-03-19T22:31:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ct-test-wp.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/?p=233"},"modified":"2015-03-19T22:31:58","modified_gmt":"2015-03-19T22:31:58","slug":"strategic-planning-minutes-march-19-2015","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/strategic-planning-minutes-march-19-2015\/","title":{"rendered":"Strategic Planning \u2013 Minutes March 19, 2015"},"content":{"rendered":"

Strategic Planning Committee<\/strong><\/span>
\n2:00 p.m., Thursday, March 19, 2015
\nCafeteria Conference Room<\/p>\n

Goals and prioritization<\/strong><\/p>\n

Possible goals from last meeting<\/strong><\/p>\n

o Calendaring\/scheduling system
\no Comprehensive Program Review
\no Program review<\/p>\n

Where to focus our efforts<\/strong><\/p>\n

o Comprehensive Program Review needs to be built on Annual Program Review
\no Time to re-examine Annual Program Review<\/p>\n

Discussion of \u201cwhy we do Program Review\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

o Required<\/p>\n

i. by Title 5
\nii. by ACCJC (throughout standards, but particularly I.A (mission) and I.B (effectiveness)<\/p>\n

o Functional, not compliance<\/p>\n

i. Motivate\/support resource planning (planned requests)
\nii. Provide criteria for other resource decisions (unplanned requests)
\niii. (Re)assess external demand
\niv. Create (standard) performance profile (# students, etc.)<\/p>\n

1. Measures workflow (budget, SLO\u2019s) => Governance Council<\/p>\n

v. Motivate program improvement
\nvi. Provides link with institutional planning
\nvii. (Re)align with mission<\/p>\n

Discussion of what it would look like to accomplish the \u201cwhy\u2019s\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

o Baseline data\/analysis<\/p>\n

i. Use existing program review (baseline) data set \u2013 no change needed
\nii. Augment with baseline \u201canalysis\u201d<\/p>\n

1. Discussion what should that analysis look like?
\n2. Need to focus, use \u201cminimum viable\u201d strategy, progressively focus
\nComprehensive PR => PR => baseline analysis => 80% => triage
\nMay be more to work on than can be done immediately \u2013 use idea of \u201ctriage\u201d to
\nfocus even further on highest priority sub-80% courses
\nIncorporate \u201chalf done is not done\u201d strategy \u2013 do less, to completion of full
\nimprovement cycle<\/p>\n

3. Broad use of 80% rule on course completion as the baseline analysis<\/p>\n

a. Flow into student success (SSSP), equity, budget, Academic Senate<\/p>\n

4. Augment with retention
\n5. MVPR (Minimum Viable Program Review) addresses courses that fall below
\n80%,
\n6. More strongly \u2013 need to have addressed sub-80% courses before proposing
\nbeyond that<\/p>\n

o Establishing spending \u201ccriteria\u201d more than soon-to-be-outdated decisions<\/p>\n

i. Captures alignment with mission, strategic intent and priorities better than fixed set of momentary \u201cneeds\u201d, \u201cwants\u201d<\/p>\n

o Timeline that is short-cycle<\/p>\n

i. Not current problem of decision sets that are 1-2 years old
\nii. Quick process anchored in standard analysis, adaptive, agile<\/p>\n

o Make real the alignment of SLO\u2019s \uf0f3 student achievement \uf0f3 budgets
\no MVPR \u2013 Minimum Viable Program Review<\/p>\n

i. Purpose is to tell a story that supports both planned and unplanned spending decisions
\nii. Could be as short as couple of pages if properly anchored in the standard analysis (NOT just presenting standard dataset without the story\u2026)<\/p>\n

o Incremental\/Integrated<\/p>\n

i. Extend idea from accreditation discussion that *defines* committee work in terms of accreditation standards
\nii. Similarly, *define* program review work in existing context(s), not a periodic chore unrelated to the regular work of the college<\/p>\n

1. Academic Senate
\n2. Committees (e.g. budget)
\n3. Division\/departmental meetings<\/p>\n

Where to start? Next steps?<\/strong><\/p>\n

o Bring these ideas to the Governance Council \u2013 essential role in all resource decisions
\no Create standard analysis<\/p>\n

i. 80% rule to identify disproportionately impacted courses vis-\u00e0-vis completion
\n(Not disaggregated by demographics for purposes of Program Review \u2013 that work done elsewhere by Student Success and Equity committees)
\nii. 80% rule vis-\u00e0-vis retention<\/p>\n

o SPC to analyze\/refine the \u201cstandard analysis\u201d
\no SPC proposal for process to create budget<\/p>\n

i. Decisions \u2013 for long-cycle, strategic decisions, (generally) larger scope
\nii. Priorities, criteria \u2013 for short-cycle, tactical decisions, (generally) smaller scope
\niii. Define \u201cthresholds and exceptions\u201d processes for decisions\/priorities\/criteria<\/p>\n

1. For District funding
\n2. For categorical funding
\n3. For grants<\/p>\n

o Bring budget decisions\/priorities\/criteria *process* proposal back to Governance Council for discussion<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

MW\/by
\nAttachments<\/p>\n

\"Minutes_March_19_2015_Page_3\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\"Minutes_March_19_2015_Page_4\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\"Minutes_March_19_2015_Page_5\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

SPC_2015_MINUTES_03-19<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Strategic Planning Committee 2:00 p.m., Thursday, March 19, 2015 Cafeteria Conference Room Goals and prioritization Possible goals from last meeting o Calendaring\/scheduling system o Comprehensive Program Review o Program review Where to focus our efforts o Comprehensive Program Review needs to be built on Annual Program Review o Time to re-examine Annual Program Review Discussion<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-233","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-11","category-minutes"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=233"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=233"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=233"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=233"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}