{"id":239,"date":"2015-04-07T22:48:52","date_gmt":"2015-04-07T22:48:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ct-test-wp.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/?p=239"},"modified":"2015-04-07T22:48:52","modified_gmt":"2015-04-07T22:48:52","slug":"strategic-planning-minutes-april-7-2015","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/strategic-planning-minutes-april-7-2015\/","title":{"rendered":"Strategic Planning \u2013 Minutes April 7, 2015"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: center\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline\"><strong>Minutes of the Strategic Planning Committee<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n8 a.m. \u2013 10:00 a.m., Tuesday, April 7, 2015<br \/>\nCafeteria Conference Room<\/p>\n<p><strong>Members Present:<\/strong> Eric B\u00e9rub\u00e9, Darcy Bogle, Vicki Jacobi, James May, Mark Williams,<br \/>\nAgnes JEguaras, and Brandy Young<\/p>\n<p><strong>Members Absent:<\/strong> Greg Hawkins, Karen Ziegler<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. Annual Accreditation Report<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The ACCJC Annual Accreditation Report is due April 15th. An extension was granted from the March 15th due date so that the report could be reviewed by both the Strategic Planning Committee and the Governance Council. The areas of focus today:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"padding-left: 30px\">Institution Set Standards \u2013 Question # 14a. It was decided that the average from fall 2014 would be used to compute the number<\/li>\n<li style=\"padding-left: 30px\">Correspondence education \u2013 it was agreed that the District does indeed have these types of courses<\/li>\n<li style=\"padding-left: 30px\">Eric will work with the staff from the Office of Instruction to complete the other areas of the report, CTE, etc.<\/li>\n<li style=\"padding-left: 30px\">The committee will meet again on April 14th to finalize the report<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>2. Program Review Data Analysis<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The committee discussed the new idea of Minimum Viable Program Review (MVPR). The idea\u00a0stemmed from the need for a standard analysis of data sets used for program review. The flow of the MVPR was laid out as:<\/p>\n<p>Traditional Program Review data \u2192 Other data \u2013 ISS, Scorecard, Dashboard \u2192 From that data, produce a clear picture \u2013 Radar chart \u2192 Look at successful course completion \u2192 80% rule \u2192 Identify lowest 5% within other areas \u2013 look for trends &#8211; Equity, SLOs, Gateway courses \u2192 Disaggregate courses by discipline \u2192 Implement intervention strategies not only within instructional programs but within student services as well \u2192 create Program Review goals \u2192 defend budget requests using conclusions from MVPR \u2192 align process with Strategic Action Plan goals, IEPI measures:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"padding-left: 30px\">Outcome measure \u2013 disaggregate<\/li>\n<li style=\"padding-left: 30px\">Isolate effects<\/li>\n<li style=\"padding-left: 30px\">Identify and implement intervention<\/li>\n<li style=\"padding-left: 30px\">Monitor outcome<\/li>\n<li style=\"padding-left: 30px\">Adjust<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>3. IEPI \u2013 Institutional Effectiveness Program Initiative &#8211; tabled for April 14th meeting<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>4. Substantive Change Monitoring Process<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>A spreadsheet was created to track Substantive Changes within the Instructional Programs. The spreadsheet lists the ACCJC criteria that is used to determine the need for a Substantive Change report. The Tech Review Committee will review all new courses and programs and use the checklist to determine if any changes trigger the need to initiate the Substantive Change process. If a need is determined, the Tech Review Committee will forward the information to the ALO, Eric for further review. If Eric agrees the process requires submission of the Step-One form, the information will be sent to the Curriculum Committee for further discussion. The Academic Senate and the Governance Council will be included in the discussion. Other points of discussion:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"padding-left: 30px\">The original process to identify the need for a Substantive Change was embedded in the\u00a0Annual Program Review form<\/li>\n<li style=\"padding-left: 30px\">The process will need to be initiated for the Welding program<\/li>\n<li style=\"padding-left: 30px\">The Engineering program did not require a report<\/li>\n<li style=\"padding-left: 30px\">There is the question of online courses and how many are offered<\/li>\n<li style=\"padding-left: 30px\">Need to verify the online courses offered for degrees and certificates<\/li>\n<li style=\"padding-left: 30px\">The process for Substantive Change is the same for both the Chancellor\u2019s office and the\u00a0ACCJC, but the rules are different<\/li>\n<li style=\"padding-left: 30px\">The next steps: The General Education and Curriculum Committee will have a discussion at their next meeting. The discussion will be taken to the Governance Council and the\u00a0Academic Senate<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>MW\/by<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Strategic Planning Committee<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Program Review design notes v2<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">\u2666 Designing toward the minimum viable program review that meets the why\u2019s of<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px\">o Resource decisions \u21d4 student achievement \u21d4 student learning<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">\u2666 PRD*: a new standard data set, building on the existing data framework<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px\">o PRD: Program Review data,<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 90px\">\uf0a7 aligned with scorecard data definitions<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px\">o Scorecard data \u2013<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 90px\">\uf0a7 suitably disaggregated and generalized,<br \/>\n\uf0a7 not just the 6\u2010yr cohorts<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px\">o Augmented by possibly other data<br \/>\no Presented graphically in a standard way \u2010 (graphs, radar diagram, red\/yellow\/green lists)<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">\u2666 MVPR \u2013 successful course completion as the \u201cminimum viable\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px\">o Outcome of governance counsel retreat and presentations =&gt; focus on successful course<br \/>\ncompletion<br \/>\no Using 80% rule to define disproportionate impace<br \/>\no To create \u201cthe list\u201d of courses that are defined as an institutional focus set<br \/>\no A prioritized subset of the list \u2013 e.g. the 5% to focus on<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 90px\">\uf0a7 Possible other ways of generating \/ prioritizing a list that are not part of the \u201cminimum viable\u201d program review<br \/>\n\uf0a7 These will be done by other groups<br \/>\n\uf0a7 E.g., disproportionate impact of equity disaggregations<br \/>\n\uf0a7 Division\/dept focus on subject codes<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px\">o Student success analytical model \u2013 e.g. the \u201cgateway\u201d classes<br \/>\no Outcome of MVPR specifically goes to Governance Council as primary support for resources requests<br \/>\no Analysis of use of SLO\u2019s to design interventions<br \/>\no MVPR is the most generic system for focusing attention on courses with low success rates<br \/>\no Focus is on integrating efforts \u2013 all\u2010hands\u2010on\u2010deck, team that engages in<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 90px\">\uf0a7 Outcome measure<br \/>\n\uf0a7 Isolate effects<br \/>\n\uf0a7 Identify and implement interventions (instr, SS, community, other\u2026)<br \/>\n\uf0a7 monitor outcome,<br \/>\n\uf0a7 adjust \u2192 cycle back to top<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">\u2666 Scaffolding \u2013 program reviews beyond the MVPR<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px\">o \u201cscaffolded\u201d \u2013 programs, depts., divisions decide on subsequent review that addresses the needs of student success, alignment with SLO\u2019s, etc.<br \/>\no These parts of review also used as basis of resource requests, etc. as normal<br \/>\no But \u2013 need to ensure MVPR is addressed first for all resource considerations \u2013 alignment of resources with institutional focus on successful course completion<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">\u2666 MVPR Interventions<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px\">o Instructional, Student Services, Facilities<br \/>\no Can be targeted, or aimed and raising ambient success (floating all)<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px\">\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px\"><a href=\"http:\/\/ct-test-wp.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2015\/08\/Minutes_April_7_2015_Page_4.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-241\" src=\"http:\/\/ct-test-wp.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2015\/08\/Minutes_April_7_2015_Page_4.png\" alt=\"Minutes_April_7_2015_Page_4\" width=\"1542\" height=\"872\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/ct-test-wp.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2015\/08\/SPC_2015_Minutes_04_07.pdf\" class=\"mtli_attachment mtli_pdf\">SPC_2015_Minutes_04_07<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Minutes of the Strategic Planning Committee 8 a.m. \u2013 10:00 a.m., Tuesday, April 7, 2015 Cafeteria Conference Room Members Present: Eric B\u00e9rub\u00e9, Darcy Bogle, Vicki Jacobi, James May, Mark Williams, Agnes JEguaras, and Brandy Young  Members Absent: Greg Hawkins, Karen Ziegler  &nbsp;  1. Annual Accreditation Report  The ACCJC Annual Accreditation Report<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-239","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-11","category-minutes"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/239"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=239"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/239\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=239"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=239"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=239"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}