{"id":321,"date":"2016-04-22T15:54:58","date_gmt":"2016-04-22T15:54:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ct-test-wp.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/?p=321"},"modified":"2016-04-22T15:54:58","modified_gmt":"2016-04-22T15:54:58","slug":"strategic-planning-minutes-march-8-2016","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/strategic-planning-minutes-march-8-2016\/","title":{"rendered":"Strategic Planning – Minutes March 8, 2016"},"content":{"rendered":"

Minutes of the Strategic Planning Committee<\/strong>
\n8:30 a.m. – 10:00 a.m., Tuesday, March 8, 2016<\/strong>
\nCaf\u00e9 Conference Room<\/strong><\/p>\n

Members Present: Eric B\u00e9rub\u00e9, Darcy Bogle, Jon Carrithers, Agnes JEguaras, Greg Hawkins, Vicki Jacobi and Mark Williams<\/p>\n

Members Absent: Diane Baeza<\/p>\n

Secretary: Brandy Young<\/p>\n

The Committee welcomed the newest member Jon Carrithers, Energy Technology Instructor. Darcy gave a brief overview of the charge of SPC.<\/p>\n

Program Review Update<\/strong>
\nThe Committee opened the discussion with an update of the Annual Program Review process and where the campus is at in the cycle. The Program Review timeline was changed to a 12 month cycle and was implemented in the fall. All Program Reviews and Goal forms were due at the end of January. Currently the Committee is reviewing all program reviews for content and use of data to support decisions. The Committee will provide feedback to Program Leads either one-on-one or via Governance Council.<\/p>\n

Some of the key points of discussion were:
\nWith Spring Break approaching, feedback will need to be given either the week prior to or one week after the holiday.
\nThe feedback process was not implemented by the SPC in the past. Debi Wooley and Eric used to meet one-on-one with Program Leads to assist with the writing of Program Reviews. Brandy Young now has this full responsibility after Debi\u2019s retirement.
\nSome initial findings are evident. The Program Review process received a commendation from the ACCJC, but the content is still lacking. The decisions are not data driven.
\nRecommendation: Compiled results of feedback for format and content trends should be presented to Governance Council as a whole during this cycle of Program Review in order to stay within the timeline.
\nRecommendation: Hold a working meeting on Wednesday, March 16 to finish reading program reviews as a group.
\nEric will compile the information collected from Survey Monkey and present it on Wednesday.
\nMark distributed a handout that outlined a proposal to improve the Program Review process by detailing a specific flow of the Program Review documents. The proposal included the addition of an Executive Summary which would summarize the findings within the Program Review. This Executive Summary would be reviewed by campus committees according to relevance and content. Recommendations from the campus committees would be presented to the SPC who in turn would provide a final summary to the Governance Council.
\nThe goal of this proposal would be to simplify the reporting and provide for data documentation (data snapshot).<\/p>\n

Institutional Effectiveness Innovation Plan<\/strong>
\nEric presented the updated Annual Program Review form and the Institutional Effectiveness Innovation Plan 2016 draft.
\nThe IEIP draft is modeled after the Bob Pacheco form used at the Governance Council retreat on February 26th. The Plan was developed after receiving recommendations from the ACCJC as well as the Institutional Effectiveness Initiative Partnership Team. The goal is to implement the plan and meet the March 2017 deadline for reaffirmation of accreditation.<\/p>\n

The framework of the plan contains the following components:
\nWhat do we need to do?
\nWhat are the reasons for the gap?
\nKnowledge
\nMotivation
\nStructure
\nNext Steps?
\nWho can lead?
\nWhat resources do we need?
\nWhen do we get this done?<\/p>\n

The focus areas of the plan are as follows:
\n1. Consistently assess SLOs for all programs (collect data)
\n2. Consistently analyze SLOs for all programs
\n3. Consistently evaluate SLOs for all programs (\u201cclose the loop\u201d with follow-up)
\n4. Fully integrate the assessment of CSLOs and PSLOs into PR, including analysis and dialog at department\/program levels
\nThe updated Annual Program Review form has been modified to stress the analysis, evaluation and dialogue related to data, mainly SLO data. The form is still a draft and other modifications are still being worked out. It was stated that the updated form equates quality for program reviews.
\nNext Meeting: March 16th at 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. in S-11
\nRespectfully submitted by Brandy Young Photo Attached<\/p>\n

Photo of proposed changes\/additions to the Annual Program Review process presented by Mark, Vicki and Darcy.<\/p>\n

Image<\/a><\/p>\n

SPC Minutes 3-8-16<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Minutes of the Strategic Planning Committee 8:30 a.m. – 10:00 a.m., Tuesday, March 8, 2016 Caf\u00e9 Conference Room Members Present: Eric B\u00e9rub\u00e9, Darcy Bogle, Jon Carrithers, Agnes JEguaras, Greg Hawkins, Vicki Jacobi and Mark Williams Members Absent: Diane Baeza Secretary: Brandy Young The Committee welcomed the newest member Jon Carrithers, Energy<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[12,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-321","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-12","category-minutes"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/321"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=321"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/321\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=321"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=321"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=321"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}