{"id":528,"date":"2017-12-18T19:01:51","date_gmt":"2017-12-18T19:01:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ct-test-wp.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/?p=528"},"modified":"2017-12-18T19:01:51","modified_gmt":"2017-12-18T19:01:51","slug":"strategic-planning-minutes-december-1-2017","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/committees.taftcollege.edu\/spc\/strategic-planning-minutes-december-1-2017\/","title":{"rendered":"Strategic Planning – Minutes December 1, 2017"},"content":{"rendered":"
Minutes<\/strong> of the <\/strong>Strategic Planning Committee <\/strong><\/p>\n 10:30 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n Friday, 12\/1\/2017<\/strong><\/p>\n Counseling Center Conference Room<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n Members present:<\/strong> Primavera Arvizu, Oleg Bespalov, Sharyn Eveland, Greg Golling, and Vicki Jacobi, Kayla Meyer, Mark Williams<\/p>\n Members absent: <\/strong>Severo Balason<\/p>\n Guests:<\/strong> Sarai Carrillo<\/p>\n <\/p>\n A draft of the Annual Committee Review was discussed.\u00a0 The SPC revised the proposed goals of the draft related to collaborating with other committees on institutional planning. The draft was approved, and will receive peer review in December.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n A draft of the Strategic Action Plan data was distributed to SPC members.\u00a0 The draft includes data for the metrics of the plan, as well as proposed goals for the metrics. The SPC will have a special meeting sometime in December to review the data.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The college has about $75,000 remaining of unspent IEPI grant funds.\u00a0 The IARP office has been receiving various requests to spend these funds.\u00a0 In the interest of integrated planning, the SPC reviewed a proposal to use the IEPI grant towards unfunded APR requests that are directly related to the grant.\u00a0 IARP conducted a review of the unfunded APR requests, and found four annual goal form requests related to SLOs from the social sciences division.\u00a0 Based on discussions with the division chair of the four goals, the division would require about $55,000 to fund the four APR goals.\u00a0 The SPC was comfortable with funding these goals to some level, but believe that the goals may be funded at a lower amount.\u00a0 The committee expressed a desire to allow Mark to continue with ongoing data related projects already in progress with the other remaining IEPI funds.\u00a0 Mark will work with the division chair to figure out exactly how much money they will need.\u00a0 The committee felt that these revisions did not need to go to Governance Council for a vote.<\/p>\n The SPC reviewed a letter from ACCJC about their new portfolio model.\u00a0 This model is similar to the WASC model, and includes a special liaison assigned to our college (ACCJC Vice President Gohar Momjian).\u00a0 This liaison will serve as the point of contact between TC and ACCJC. The liaison will also be actively involved in the next institutional self-evaluation report, including providing the college training 18 months prior to the scheduled visit, as well as selecting the team of peer reviewers that will visit TC.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n SPC discussed the proportionality index, an alternative method to calculate equity gaps. Currently, the college uses the 80% rule.\u00a0 A consensus was not reached as to whether the college should switch to the proportionality index. The SPC will continue this discussion at the next meeting.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n\n
\n<\/u><\/strong>The committee reviewed the charter at the previous SPC meeting in October. However, based on discussions at Governance Council, the changes to the charter were not approved. Instead, SPC was asked to consider the balance of faculty representation on the committee.\u00a0 Based on discussions, SPC removed an administrator (CTE Director or designee) and added a third Academic Senate Representative.\u00a0 These charter revisions, along with the revisions discussed at the October SPC meeting, will be reviewed and voted on by the Governance Council, and presented as an information item to the Academic Senate.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n